Concealing his intentions behind a smile, he knelt beside her bathtub where she reclined in serenity, this woman he’d once loved.
This line gives major creep vibes, but…murdery? And while I’m totally here for that, I suspect we can turn the volume way up on the degree to which this line is disconcerting.
The first step I’d take here is to name names. Our female…erm…soon-to-be victim (?) is defined by “this woman he’d once loved” — a fascinating way to categorize a person, and worth unpacking in detail when we finally get our hands on the published work. For now, though, I wonder what it might do to this sentence if we replaced “woman” with “wife”? If we’re looking at a married couple, does it not add a certain potency to say “the wife he’d once loved”? If they’re not married, this is a moot point — but as FLF die-hards know, we love to get as specific as possible in line 1.
Now we can turn our attention to the male…erm…soon-to-be perpetrator (??). Defining him with a first name will accentuate the disparate agency between himself and “this woman/the wife he’d once loved”. The other language choices in this sentence are clearly asking us to recognize a distinctly uneven power dynamic between these two characters: her, vulnerable and presumably naked, reclined and serene, versus him, predatory and hiding stuff and also probably clothed. If we can underscore this dynamic by giving him a name and leaving her defined only by her relationship to him, all the better.
Next I’d like us to consider the awkwardness of “her bathtub”. Is the tub exclusively for her use? Or is it just the bathtub she’s currently occupying? Using a possessive pronoun here, when we have four other pronouns in the sentence, puts me in Pronoun Overload. This is similar to Preposition Overload, when a sentence asks us to look in too many directions at once. My brain always conjures this gif during such trying times:
Pronoun Overload makes me want to shake the book until a name falls out. So far, this has been ineffective.
EDIT 1: Patrick concealed his intentions behind a smile as he knelt beside the tub.
EDIT 2: Patrick concealed his intentions behind a smile as knelt silently, loathe to disturb the wife he’d once loved while she soaked serenely in a claw-footed tub.
The first edit totally disregards everything I said about power dynamics, and focuses exclusively on Patrick’s powerful shadiness.
The second edit brings the power dynamics back into play, and does a bit more scene-setting too.
Both options are functional; they eliminate Pronoun Overload and underscore the Real Bad Vibes™ we get from the male MC. What do you think? Which edit would you choose?
Talk to me.
Book a 30-minute consultation with me, and we’ll use our time to talk about whatever you want (but probably your book). I’m happy to look at a few pages of your writing in advance, review your query letter, or read a synopsis. Use Calendly to choose the date and time, and I’ll email you to confirm.
Work with me.
If you have a completed manuscript and would like to discuss an editorial collaboration, contact me on Reedsy or via email {beccaheyman@gmail.com}.
First Line Frenzy™
To submit a first line for consideration in a future First Line Frenzy™ post, fill out the Google form here. Please read the introductory rules before submitting your line.
Hi Rebecca—As the author of this pronoun party, and in its defense, let me just say that this sentence is the opening of a one page prologue that indeed has “him” drowning “her” and yet the power dynamic completely reverses. (She goaded him into ending her life by revealing something that devastated him—and will set off the main actions in the novel) Those identities aren’t revealed until the climax. She has cancer, as is revealed in the next few sentences. The book’s subtitle is Sometimes revealing the criminal is worse than the crime itself.
Edit 1 all the way! It's far more punchy and compelling.